Had the chance to meet Jim Rubart at ACFW 2011! |
Want to confuse
yourself? Ask ten friends—or marketing people— to define branding. I predict
eight to ten different answers.
My mission—which
I’ve obviously chosen to accept—is to give a brief definition of branding you
can keep in your head after you’ve read this post.
Branding has been
a hot buzzword in the publishing world for at least ten years, but I want to go
back farther than that. In 1904 Ivan Pavlov won the Noble prize for his
research into branding. You’ve heard about his dogs. That’s branding. Ring the
bell, give the dogs meat. Do it enough and the dogs salivate without the beef.
Psychologists
call this planting an associative memory.
“I’m Tom Bodett
for _______ and we’ll leave the light on for ya.” Most of you instantly
inserted Motel 6 into the blank. Some of you even hear the folksy music in your
head and are thinking about a “clean comfortable room” and “the lowest price of
any national chain.”
Rooms |
How do we plant
an associative memory into the mind of a reader, agent, or editor?
Consistency,
frequency, and anchoring.
Consistency: Give people the same message every time. Did you know
Pavlov did his experiment again with circles? Show dogs the circles then give
them the meat. It worked. Then he changed the circles to ovals. It stopped
working. The consistency wasn’t there. This is why it’s tough—but not
impossible—to brand yourself as a nonfiction writer and a fiction writer at the
same time. Or to switch genres. Once you get into the mind with a strong
associate memory, it’s difficult to change it, or even add to it. For example,
when you hear Harry Houdini, you think magician. But who can remember that he was
the first person to fly an airplane in Australia? Even most Australians don’t
know that. Why? He already was in there mind with a different brand.
Frequency: This is easy. Keep your message out there. Often.
Anchoring: This is the tough one. Many people think by throwing together
some potent colors and coming up with a catchy tagline they’ve branded
themselves. Huh uh. Anchoring is divided into three parts:
Book of Days |
2. Anchor to something the public wants. Picking on Chip again, people want entertainment, they want to be surprised. Are they, when he steps out in his MacGregor tartan? Of course. They love it. Randy Ingermanson has branded himself as the Snowflake guy to writers and editors. At an ACFW conference a few years back I smiled as I saw his branding had become so successful it was parodied from the stage during the opening session.
3. Anchor to something you already are. Anchor to something you already are. No, that wasn’t a typo. It bears repeating because this is where more authors stumble. Many try to create a brand out of nothing:
“Suspense that
sucks you in and won’t let you go! Never! Ever! Really!”
“Making you
hyperventilate after every chapter!”
“Romance that
makes you a mush cake every time!”
The Chair |
Branding is
taking the unique elements about you and your writing that already exist and
exposing them to the world. Your brand is there; your job is to uncover it.
Yes, it’s a
challenge pinpointing what your brand is. Often we’re too close. Most people
have trouble reading the outside of the bottle when they’re standing inside. So
ask people close to you to describe your uniqueness. Brainstorm with other
authors about what sets you apart. Ask your editor, spouse, kids, agent, and
others.
Yeah, I know,
we’ve only scratched the surface. That’s why Amazon is packed with books on
branding. And why marketing people like me have jobs.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
I love God, my wife, my sons, writing, speaking, playing guitar and golf, in that order. And I dabble in photography. (and yes that's me in the ski shot above) www.jimrubart.com |
What do you think? Does Jim's comments open up a new understanding...and hopefully less daunting amount of info to consider while you do the preliminary marketing?
14 comments:
I'm one of those authors who created a tagline because I can't see what's so unique about me.
Jim, you presented great points, especially about consistency. In order to embed something in readers' minds, they need to see it often.
Very good post. Thanks for sharing!
This is VERY helpful! I think I might actually get it now. I have an idea of my brand, but not absolutely clear - and it just might be too broad. Will be reading this post over again, I'm sure.
LISA, I know what you mean. I have a tagline for right now, for my mission mainly with my blog, but for something specific for my writing? Still getting there. ;-)
JOANNE, Jim is a great teacher. I have especially loved his conference recordings. He shows it really well. Sounds like I need a refresher course...
I think we often feel like the fall leaf swooshing left and right in the wind. Oh that the leaf would land. :)
Casey, thanks for sharing this post today. It was very helpful. I don't even have a tagline yet!:) So, as I write, I will take Jim's advice and get some feedback from those who know me best. I learned a ton today, thanks, Casey!
MARY, it's easy to go with what everyone else is saying, isn't it Mary? I hear ya.
JEANNE, I always learn a lot from Jim too! Which is what makes him so good at what he does. ;-)
I don't have a tagline, either. Wrestling with thoughts on this and a million other things floating through my brain. These thoughts were very helpful. I really struggle with wanting to not be cliched yet not wanting to brand myself with something too specific that it limits me.
What an excellent post. I've been hesitant to stamp myself with a tagline for this very reason. I thought it was indecisiveness; now I realize it's branding brilliance. :)
Thank you, Jim, for sharing these thoughts today. And thanks, Casey for hosting. :)
JULIA, I know what you mean. I'm not terribly worried about "branding" me right now. I'm more concerned with learning the concept and how it applies to me, not me applying to it. So I'm learning to be myself and letting people get to know the real me. :)
SARAH, now doesn't that make you feel better? ;)
Great interview! Jim's always got something valuable to say. I particularly appreciated the part about anchoring... so true, yet something we don't usually think about!
Wow! I understand it so much better now...but have to process it a bunch for my own "branding"! :)
Good post!
A most excellent post -- as to be expected from Jim. I'm still tossing the word "broca" around after hearing Jim speaking at the MBT Scrimmage workshop last year before the ACFW conference last year. The guy just changes the way you think about things.
Fabulous post!
It's made me stop and really consider what my 'brand' is from what I already do.
Love it!
But it's my Jim, so really no surprise there ;-)
Thanks for having him on, Case!
Jim, this is a really helpful post! Thanks. I'll keep this post and read it again. I need to think about branding more often!
Post a Comment